Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #29307
    Prasad s
    Participant

    Find all polynomials P(x) with real coefficient such that:
    P(0) = 0, and ⌊P⌊P(n)⌋⌋ + n = 4⌊P(n)⌋ ∀n ∈ N.

    #29360
    Agamdeep Singh
    Participant

    let (c,d) be the interval in which [p(n)] = k. (k is some constant in the range of p(x))

    let r lie between in the interval (c,d).

    we have,

    ⌊P⌊P(r)⌋⌋ + r = 4⌊P(r)⌋

    ⌊P(k)⌋ + r = 4k                  - [eq 1]

    let e be such that r+e also lies in (c,d)

    ⌊P⌊P(r+e)⌋⌋ + r+e = 4⌊P(r+e)⌋

    ⌊P(k)⌋ + r + e = 4k            - [eq 2]

    [eq 2] - [eq 1]

    e=0

    therefore no such interval in which ⌊P(x)⌋ is constant.

     

    since a polynomial is continuous, every polynomial has to take values from some integer m to m + 1 and in the  interval [ m , m+1) , ⌊P(x)⌋ = constant.  [for p(x) in that range.]

    but since there is no such interval in which ⌊P(x)⌋ is constant, there is no such polynomial.

     

    #29387
    Nitin Prasad
    Participant

     

     

    #29448
    Nitin Prasad
    Participant

    Consider some polynomial P(x) with degree>1. Observe that for large values of natural numbers n,  $$\frac{4P(n)}{P(P(n))+n}$$ is approximately 0. Using this idea it seems that our polynomial must be a constant polynomial. Though these were loose arguments and now we need to make our arguments precise. For this, few lemmas have been stated without proof.

    Lemma 1 : Consider polynomial P(x) ∈ R[x] of degree n>0 such that its leading coefficient is positive. It can be shown that there exist natural number m such that P(x) is strictly increasing function in the interval [m,\infty).

    Lemma 2: Consider polynomial P(x) ∈ R[x] of degree n>1 such that its leading coefficient is positive. Then there exist natural number m such that P(x)>m    ∀ x>m and is strictly increasing in the interval [m,\infty)
    Proof sketch: Consider polynomial Q(x)=P(x)-x. By lemma 1, there exist m such that Q(x)is strictly increasing in [m,\infty). Hence P(x)-x>0 for all x>m i.e. P(x)>x>m for all x>m.

    Solution: We consider following cases for P(x) ∈ R[x]-

    1)      Degree of P(x)>1 & leading coefficient is positive: Then by the above lemma 2, there exist natural number m such that P(x) is strictly increasing function in the interval (m,\infty) and P(x)>m for all x>m . Hence we have-

    $$P(P(n)-1))+n-1<P⌊P(n)⌋-1+n <⌊P⌊P(n)⌋⌋ + n = 4⌊P(n)⌋<4(P(n)+1)        ∀n ∈ N.$$
    $$\Longrightarrow P(P(n)-1))-4P(n)+n-5<0        ∀n ∈ N.$$

    Now observe that P(P(n)+1))-4P(n)+n+5  is a polynomial of degree>0 with positive leading coefficient. Hence by lemma1 we arrive at a contradiction.

    2)      Degree of P(x)>1 & leading coefficient is negative: Similar to above case and leads to a contradiction

    3)      Degree of P(x) at most 1: Consider P(x)=ax+b. Since P(0)=0 Hence b=0. Now we have ⌊a⌊an⌋⌋ + n = 4⌊an ⌋

    #29459
    Nitin Prasad
    Participant

    3)  Degree of P(x) at most 1: Consider P(x)=ax+b. Since P(0)=0 Hence b=0. Now we have ⌊a⌊an⌋⌋ + n = 4⌊an ⌋. Now observe that-
    $$\lim_{n\longrightarrow\infty}\frac{⌊a⌊an⌋⌋ + n}{4⌊an⌋}=\lim_{n\longrightarrow\infty}$$

    $$\Longrightarrow \frac{a^2+1}{4a}=1$$

    $$\Longrightarrow a=2+\sqrt{3}\; or\; a=2-\sqrt{3}$$

    a) $$ P(x)=(2-\sqrt{3})x$$ cannot be a solution for it fails to satisfy the given condition for n=1.
    b) Surprisingly $$latex P(x)=(2+\sqrt{3})x$$ does satisfy our solution. The equation
    $$⌊(2+\sqrt(3))⌊(2+\sqrt(3))n⌋⌋ + n = 4⌊(2+\sqrt(3))n ⌋$$ reduces to

    $$⌊(2-\sqrt(3)){\sqrt(3n)} ⌋=0$$ which is indeed true. Calculation part for this shown below

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram