Shivani Ramesh

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Equivalence Relation to Partition #24706
    Shivani Ramesh
    Participant

    No the statement is false.

    Let's take an example,

    if we make a rule and declare that the difference between x and y isĀ  divisible by 3 which makes an equivalence relation

    so in this way we can partition many sets like

    {0,3,6,9,12...............}

    {1,4,7..................}

    {2,5,8,11..............}

    by this we cannot partition all the numbers because it is infinite

    and we can get the equivalence relation back so this proves that the statement is false.

    in reply to: Equivalence Relation to Partition #24697
    Shivani Ramesh
    Participant

    It is true because:

    every equivalence relation is

    -symmetric

    -reflexive and

    -transitive

    so when we partition the sets they are reflexive, symmetric and transitive

     

    in reply to: Proof of equivalence #24362
    Shivani Ramesh
    Participant
    • A point is equivalent only when it has 3 critical properties:
    • symmetric(a~a)
      reflexive(a~b and b~a)
      transitive(a~b , b~c , c~a)
    • We tell some points as same when we glue those points.
    • When we glue these points in a certain manner we get a 3 dimensional figure.
    • Congurence is equivalence
    • It is reflexive as anything is congurent to itself.
    • Suppose any number is congurent to another number it will be congurent to it.
    • Since a~b,b~c,a~c.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)